The first two types reflect ways of looking at the world that are highly influential in the United States and elsewhere today, so we must examine them carefully. It suggests that there was no agenda outside of God that God was following--nothing outside of God that directed what were acceptable options.
With unmitigated pride it claims the right to create rather than procreate. We treat them rightly when we treat them as gifts rather than as products, and when we treat them as independent beings whom we are duty-bound to protect and nurture rather than as extensions of ourselves subject only to our wills and whims.
Assisted reproduction techniques like IVF do not involve the former, but do involve the latter and are therefore still rightly considered sexual reproduction. First, as suggested earlier, to allow cloning is to open the door to a much more frightening enterprise: The challenge for our society is to determine, through public deliberation and thoughtful reflection, how best to adjudicate between these two desires and to determine what form to give to the tacit agreement between society and science, by which society promises freedom within bounds, and science affords us innovation, knowledge, and power while respecting reasonable limits.
What are some of the consequences we need to be concerned about?
In rare cases, we even ban certain practices, such as the buying and selling of organs for transplantation. Cloning, after all, is a technique, a means of reaching some desired end. Opinions on this subject will of course differ, sometimes widely, as they rest on possibly differing perceptions of human procreation and family life.
Regardless of any future legal resolutions of such matters, child clones not to mention others inside and outside the family will almost certainly experience confusion. Beginning with techniques of artificial insemination and progressing through in vitro fertilization IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, artificial aids to reproduction have come into standard medical use.
Again, there are many forms that autonomy justifications can take. Moreover, there are other ways that the pursuit of utility and autonomy are troubling from a theological perspective.
Valuing freedom and innovation, our society allows scientists to inquire as they wish, to explore freely, and to develop techniques and technologies based on the knowledge they find, and on the whole we all benefit greatly as a result.
As long as the people making autonomous choices happen to have good moral character that predisposes them to be concerned about the well-being of everyone else, there will not be serious problems.
Social intrusion in this realm is particularly odious. Scientific work is also restricted from activities that might harm the health of the general public, and from producing products that may endanger consumers. The use of embryos has aided research on early human development. Human cloning-for-biomedical-research therefore brings the moral question of means before us with even greater force.
The challenge we face involves the conflict of competing sets of concerns and priorities, each in the service of vital human goods, and each driven by a desire to improve the human condition and to protect essential principles.
Accordingly, the Council is unanimous in owning the entire report and in recommending, to all, the report's discussions and arguments for serious consideration.
To address these questions, we must appreciate the human good of biomedical science in its fullness, and we must ask about the necessary and sufficient conditions for its flourishing.
Popular discussions center on the wonderful prospects of creating multiple Mother Teresas, Michael Jordans, or other notable figures.
In sexual reproduction, v each child has two complementary biological progenitors. National Bioethics Advisory Commission's report has observed echoed more recently by the report of the President's Council on Bioethicshuman cloning "invokes images of manufacturing children according to specification.
We focus first on the broad human goods that it may serve or threaten, rather than on the immediate impact of the technique itself. Would social attitudes toward children change, even if cloning were not practiced widely?
Leon Kass has observed that we have traditionally used the word "procreation" for having children because we have viewed the world, and human life in particular, as created by God. Properly to assess the meaning of producing cloned children, one must first of all consider the meaning of human procreation in all its aspects and entailments.
When only one particular use of human cloning is intended, we use the more specific term. No wonder our respect for human life is deteriorating. Back to Text The term "sexual reproduction" has two related meanings: In the remainder of this overview, we describe the context of human cloning and the discussions it has generated.
But using other people without their consent for our ends is a violation of their status as beings created in the image of God. It is also recognized in the established practice of technology assessment, which seeks to find the least problematic and least dangerous means for achieving a desirable end.
Needless to say, it is impossible to obtain a clone's consent to be brought into existence through cloning.It is out of this context that some people are now attempting to justify human cloning.
The transfer of cloning techniques to humans, however, creates a host of unique technical, ethical and social issues that aren’t currently raised in the cloning of animals. The human cloning debate is closely intertwined with the long- running argument over the relative importance of genes (nature) and the environment (nurture) in shaping people.
Knowledge is Power: The Importance of Informing People of Cloning ( words, 1 pages) Implications of cloning Many don't realize how serious the advent of cloning really is. When cloning is mentioned, half of the world thinks of. CLONING HUMAN BEINGS development of new therapies with the potential to help many people.
In contrast to their views on the use of nuclear transfer cloning for basic developmental developed with knowledge gained from the cloning of genes and cells. In addition, a legislative. When questioned, military and government officials either deny any knowledge of these sprayings outright or they offer unbelievable and ludicrous explanations that only a moron could believe.
These sprayings are making many people sick and are the first phase of a bio-warfare operation designed to effect wide scale population reduction.
Knowledge is Power: The Importance of Informing People of Cloning ( words, 1 pages) Implications of cloning Many don't realize how serious the advent of cloning really is. When cloning is mentioned, half of the world thinks of Dolly, the "magical splitting sheep".Download